Recruitment · Omarea

Phase 0 (Criteria): have your say

Before Phase 1 begins on Oct 16, tell the area what makes an outstanding candidate.

Phase 2 (Shortlist): classify your files

For the Phase 2 committee. A full read of each file, four readers per file.

Calendar

The process

People involved

Ground rules

EDI training first. Only faculty who have completed the Equity and Excellence in Academic Recruitment training may review files, discuss candidates or vote. Track it in the EDI Training tab.
Criteria before Phase 1. At an area meeting before Phase 1 begins, we agree on what makes an outstanding candidate (field, topic, research quality) and how we decide (a vote, a point system). Once set, neither can change.
A diverse shortlist. The shortlist sent to central must include at least one candidate from a marginalized background (gender or ethnicity).
Approval before invitations. The shortlist goes to the Dean and the Vice-Dean (Academic and Faculty Affairs) for approval before invitations go out. Academic Affairs then moves the approved candidates to the Workday reference check.
Watch every talk. Everyone who votes must watch every finalist's presentation, live or recorded, and be present for the vote.
A pool, not a name. The area recommends a pool of candidates to hire, not a single candidate.
Some flyouts may be virtual, depending on where candidates are and how long their visas would take.

From the Dean's Representative and the Academic Affairs Office.

Phase 0

Criteria for an outstanding candidate

Criteria and selection processLoading…

Before Oct 16, tell the area what makes an outstanding candidate. Be concrete: name the fields, topics, journals and research record you expect. Comments go in the same box.

FieldsTopicsJournalsResearch recordTeachingAnything else

Loading…

Submissions

Loading…

Only OM Area Hub members can see this page. Private posts are visible only to their author and Juan.

Phase 1

Screening

Loading…

Phase 2.1

First round

Loading…